Contact

Author: Luis Lupian

  • De-Risking Your Robotics Venture: The MVP Development and Validation Stage

    De-Risking Your Robotics Venture: The MVP Development and Validation Stage

    Building a successful robotics business is no small feat. It requires navigating multiple stages in a long and arduous journey, each with its own challenges and milestones. After completing Concept Formulation and Validation, the next critical step in the journey is MVP Development and Validation.

    This phase is where vision meets execution, and the foundation for de-risking the venture is established. Let’s explore how to approach this stage effectively and avoid common pitfalls.

    Breaking Down Assumptions: Leap-of-Faith Thinking

    The MVP stage begins with a clear understanding of your Value Proposition and Customer Archetype, identified during the conceptual phase. However, these ideas remain hypotheses until rigorously tested. Founders must prioritize their Leap-of-Faith Assumptions—the critical beliefs that directly impact the venture’s viability. These assumptions should be systematically tested through targeted experiments.

    Ask yourself:

    • Is the problem worth solving?
    • Does the solution truly address it?

    The answers to these deceptively simple questions determine whether your solution has a viable path forward.

    The MVP: A Tool for Learning, Not Perfection

    At its core, an MVP (Minimum Viable Product) is a learning tool, not a finished product. Its primary goal is to validate assumptions quickly and cost-effectively, reducing risks before scaling further. For robotics startups, this might mean using Wizard-of-Oz prototypes (manually controlled robots) or Concierge MVPs (providing services manually to simulate automation). These approaches allow for early testing without the heavy costs of full autonomy or polished designs.

    Key success factors:

    • Focus on Learning: Each MVP iteration should aim to validate one core assumption at a time.
    • Define Success Criteria: Set measurable benchmarks for validation, such as usability scores, operational efficiency metrics, or customer adoption rates.
    • Be Agile: Gather feedback, refine, and pivot as necessary.

    Common Challenges to Avoid

    1. Skipping Validation Steps: Rushing to build a polished product without testing core assumptions is a critical mistake. Remember, perfectionism is the enemy of progress.
    2. Underestimating Costs: MVP development requires careful budgeting. Balance resource allocation between development, testing, and customer engagement.
    3. Misinterpreting Feedback: Customer input is invaluable but vague or overly positive feedback can mislead. Use the MVP as an opportunity to probe deeper to uncover actionable insights.
    4. Overinvesting in Automation Too Early: Full autonomy is rarely required for initial testing. Simpler solutions often suffice to validate hypotheses.

    A Roadmap for the MVP Stage

    To structure your efforts effectively, follow these steps:

    1. Identify and Prioritize Leap-of-Faith Assumptions: Focus on the riskiest and most impactful hypotheses first.
    2. Develop and Deploy MVPs: Keep them simple, focusing on testing critical assumptions with minimal investment.
    3. Iterate and Refine: Use the Build-Measure-Learn loop to gather insights, refine the product, and align it with customer needs.

    Deliverables for this stage include:

    • Validated Value Hypothesis: Proof that your solution addresses a real, meaningful problem.
    • Baseline Metrics Dashboard: Initial performance data to guide further development.
    • Early User Feedback: Actionable insights to inform design and operational improvements.

    Building Momentum for the Next Stage

    By the end of this phase, your team should have achieved Problem-Solution Fit, demonstrating that your solution effectively addresses a validated problem. This paves the way for the next critical stage: Pilot and Beta Testing.

    The MVP Development and Validation stage is not just about proving your technology works—it’s about proving that it matters. By embracing this mindset, robotics entrepreneurs can build scalable, impactful solutions that meet real customer needs.

    What challenges have you faced during the MVP stage? Share your experiences or insights below! Don’t forget to sign up for our newsletter to stay in the loop.

    Join the conversation on LinkedIn

  • The Critical Foundation for Robotics Ventures Success: The Concept and Validation Stage

    The Critical Foundation for Robotics Ventures Success: The Concept and Validation Stage

    In the journey of a robotics startup, the first stage—Concept and Validation—sets the foundation for long-term success. 🌟 This stage is where vision meets reality, as founding teams explore the intersection of market needs and technical possibilities. While the potential of robotics entrepreneurship is undeniable, this stage requires careful navigation to avoid common pitfalls and ensure the venture is built on a solid foundation.

    A Balancing Act: Vision Meets Market Reality

    Robotics ventures typically emerge from diverse founding teams—technologists, business strategists, and industry experts united by a shared enthusiasm to deliver impactful solutions. Often inspired by emerging technologies or perceived market needs, these teams begin with a concept that is promising but unpolished. Initial ideas are usually informed by the team’s technical expertise or firsthand observations of inefficiencies in target industries.

    However, this enthusiasm can also be a double-edged sword. Many robotics startups fall into the trap of building solutions in search of a problem. 🚧 As highlighted in our recent article, “Why We Need a Refined Definition of Robotics-as-a-Service (RaaS),” the focus must shift from the technology to the customer problem being addressed. The RaaS model’s promise lies not in robotics for robotics’ sake but in delivering scalable, subscription-based services that solve real, validated problems for specific customer segments.

    Avoiding the “Tech-First” Trap

    Many RaaS startups are born out of academic or research environments, where technical validation often overshadows market relevance. While publishing papers and perfecting prototypes in controlled environments demonstrates technical prowess, it can also lead to overconfidence in the solution’s viability. The real world, however, demands a shift in perspective. Entrepreneurs must begin with the problem—not the solution—and validate its relevance to real-world needs.

    From personal experience as a first-time entrepreneur, I learned the critical importance of problem-first thinking. In one instance, our team invested heavily in an innovative robotic system only to discover that the market segment we targeted had little interest in addressing the problem our technology solved. This misstep emphasized the need for disciplined customer discovery and iterative problem validation.

    Two Key Hypotheses for Validation

    The Concept and Validation stage revolves around formulating two fundamental hypotheses:

    1. Value Creation Hypothesis: What unique value does the proposed RaaS solution deliver? This hypothesis explores the specific problem being addressed and the measurable benefits to the customer.
    2. Customer Archetype Hypothesis: Who is the ideal customer? Identifying a clear customer profile—industries, company sizes, operational contexts—is crucial for targeting efforts and refining the solution’s value proposition.

    Treat these hypotheses as assumptions, not facts. 🧪 Founders must adopt a scientific mindset, gathering evidence through structured interviews, surveys, and observations to justify their direction. Each iteration brings the team closer to a validated understanding of their target market and the problem they aim to solve.

    Deliverables of the Concept and Validation Stage

    To ensure informed progress, the following milestones should be achieved during this stage:

    1. Conceptual Prototypes or Mockups: Create visual or interactive representations of the solution to facilitate conversations with stakeholders and attract early interest.
    2. Initial Business Model Outline: Develop a preliminary framework for revenue streams, cost structures, and key partnerships.
    3. Founding Team Formation: Identify skill gaps, assign clear roles, and draft job descriptions for future hires.
    4. Market Research and Competitive Analysis: Explore target industries and customer segments while identifying gaps and opportunities for differentiation.
    5. Securing Initial Funding: Source early funding from founders, friends, family, or angel investors to sustain initial exploration and development efforts.

    Avoiding the Pitfalls ⚠️

    Founders must remain vigilant against common traps:

    • Hearing What You Want to Hear: Customers often express interest in broad terms. Ask specific, open-ended questions to uncover actionable insights and avoid confirmation bias.
    • Skipping Validation Steps: The excitement of building can lead to skipping critical validation milestones. Resist this urge and prioritize disciplined exploration.

    The Foundation for Informed Progress

    By achieving these milestones, RaaS startups ensure they enter the next stage—MVP Development and Validation—with confidence. This disciplined approach reduces the risk of pursuing dead-end solutions and sets the foundation for a scalable, customer-driven business.

    Share Your Thoughts

    How have you navigated the challenges of the Concept and Validation stage in your startup? Share your experiences in the comments 💬. Don’t forget to sign up for our newsletter for expert insights and practical resources to help you build and scale your RaaS venture.

    Join the conversation on LinkedIn

  • Why Robotics Startups Fail: Three Critical Mistakes to Avoid

    Why Robotics Startups Fail: Three Critical Mistakes to Avoid

    Robotics startups are uniquely positioned to disrupt industries, yet many fail to achieve their potential due to strategic missteps. 🌍👷

    Below, we explore three critical mistakes these startups often make and offer practical steps to avoid them.

    1. Relying on a Traditional Waterfall Roadmap Instead of Validated Learning

    ⚙️💡 Many robotics startups default to a roadmap focused on achieving technological feature milestones. While this may seem logical, it often results in excessive development costs and delays, with products that fail to resonate with their target markets.

    Why It’s Problematic

    Traditional roadmaps assume that market and customer needs are static. In reality, startups operate under high uncertainty. By the time the product is built, critical assumptions—such as customer pain points or willingness to pay—may prove false. This results in wasted time and resources.

    How to Avoid It

    • Adopt Lean Principles: Prioritize learning milestones over technological ones. Start with your Leap-of-Faith Assumptions and test them early through experiments to enable short iteration cycles that quickly validate key assumptions and reduce risks.
    • Iterative Development: Develop Minimum Viable Products (MVPs) designed as targeted experiments to test specific hypotheses. Each MVP must define clear success metrics and aim to validate one core assumption at a time for maximum learning efficiency.
    • Customer Involvement: Engage with customers frequently. Their feedback should shape the product roadmap to ensure alignment with real-world needs.

    2. Implementing Bureaucratic Approval Processes

    ⌛❌ Layered approval processes slow decision-making and hinder adaptability. In an industry where hardware development already takes significant time, bureaucracy exacerbates delays and stifles innovation.

    Why It’s Problematic

    Robotics startups need to be agile to respond quickly to new insights and market demands. Bureaucratic layers create bottlenecks, leading to missed opportunities and slower time-to-market.

    How to Avoid It

    • Empower Cross-Functional Teams: Small, autonomous teams should be authorized to make decisions within set parameters. Each team should focus on the entirety of an experiment, ensuring accountability and seamless integration of findings, rather than fragmenting their efforts into isolated features. This approach fosters accountability and speeds up execution.
    • Streamline Approval Pipelines: Adopt lightweight governance models, such as rolling reviews, to maintain oversight without introducing delays.
    • Continuous Feedback Loops: Use sprint reviews and retrospectives to stay agile while maintaining focus on long-term goals.

    3. Measuring Progress Using Vanity Metrics

    💩🕵️ Startups often fall into the trap of tracking vanity metrics—such as social media followers, the number of prototypes built, or cumulative KPIs—that offer little insight into business viability.

    Why It’s Problematic

    Vanity metrics create a false sense of progress, masking deeper issues such as product-market fit and customer satisfaction. Startups must recognize that their ultimate goal transcends developing a technological product; they are striving to build a sustainable and scalable business. Vanity metrics fail to provide actionable insights crucial for driving meaningful growth.

    How to Avoid It

    • Focus on Actionable Metrics: Track metrics that validate your hypotheses, such as customer retention, engagement, or the cost of customer acquisition. For every MVP-driven experiment, it is essential to identify and track specific metrics directly tied to the hypothesis being tested. This ensures that each step delivers actionable insights and refines the startup’s understanding of its market.
    • Use Innovation Accounting: Measure learning milestones, such as the number of validated assumptions or the speed of iteration cycles. The relevance of specific learning milestones depends heavily on the startup’s stage, as early-stage ventures focus on problem validation, while later stages prioritize scaling and optimization.
    • Assess Strategic Direction: Evaluate the relevance of achieved learning milestones when deciding whether to stay the course on the current strategy or pivot to a new one. This ensures that strategic decisions are data-driven and aligned with validated insights.

    Conclusion

    Avoiding these three critical mistakes can significantly enhance a robotics startup’s chances of success. 🏆🚀

    By embracing validated learning, streamlining decision-making, and focusing on meaningful metrics, entrepreneurs can navigate the complexities of the robotics industry more effectively.

    Have you encountered these challenges in your journey? Share your thoughts and strategies in the LinkedIn article below; we’d love to learn from your experiences!

    🌟 Sign up for our newsletter to stay updated on expert insights, actionable resources, and community stories. Let’s shape the future of robotics together!

    Join the conversation on LinkedIn

  • Introducing Robotics Innovators Hub: A Community for Entrepreneurs Who Dare to Disrupt

    Introducing Robotics Innovators Hub: A Community for Entrepreneurs Who Dare to Disrupt

    As we kick off the year 2025, we’re thrilled to announce an exciting milestone: the launch of Robotics Innovators Hub, a platform dedicated to connecting robotics entrepreneurs who are not just building technology, but reshaping industries. Robotics Innovators Hub is more than a website; it’s a community focused on business strategies for launching and scaling successful robotics ventures.

    Why Robotics Innovators Hub?

    While many resources focus on the technical aspects of robotics, there is a significant gap in addressing the 💼 business-side challenges: market validation, fundraising, scaling operations, and finding a sustainable business model. Robotics Innovators Hub fills this gap, offering content, tools, and peer insights to help entrepreneurs navigate these hurdles effectively.

    In a world where many robotics startups falter due to a lack of product-market fit or scalability issues, our mission is to foster collaboration and learning, turning ambitious ideas into thriving businesses.

    What You Can Expect

    1. 📚 Expert Articles and Case Studies: Gain insights from seasoned founders, investors, and business leaders in the robotics ecosystem.
    2. 🛠️ Practical Frameworks: Learn structured approaches to validate your business model, manage resources, and achieve operational excellence.
    3. 🌍 Community Stories: Share and discover real-world experiences from robotics entrepreneurs around the globe.
    4. 📊 Actionable Resources: Access curated tools and templates designed to help you solve real-world challenges.

    Join Us on This Journey

    Our vision is simple yet powerful: to create a 🌟 thriving community where robotics entrepreneurs can learn from each other’s successes and failures. Together, we can accelerate innovation and bring transformative solutions to market faster and more effectively.

    Whether you are a founder, investor, or industry professional, Robotics Innovators Hub is your space to connect, share, and grow.

    Visit us today and become part of the conversation shaping the future of robotics entrepreneurship.

    📧 Stay Connected Sign up for our newsletter to stay updated on new resources, expert insights, and community stories as Robotics Innovators Hub evolves. Don’t miss out, join now and be part of the innovation!

    🏆 What’s Your Story?

    We’d love to hear from you! Share your experiences, challenges, and aspirations in the comments below. How do you see Robotics Innovators Hub playing a role in your journey? Let’s build this ecosystem together.

    Join the conversation on LinkedIn

  • Why We Need a Refined Definition of Robotics-as-a-Service (RaaS)

    Why We Need a Refined Definition of Robotics-as-a-Service (RaaS)

    The term Robotics-as-a-Service (RaaS) has become a cornerstone of the robotics industry, yet its definition remains narrow and has become outdated. Traditionally, RaaS is defined as a subscription-based model where customers pay for robotic services rather than purchasing hardware outright. The RaaS company retains ownership of the robotic fleet, eliminating heavy upfront costs for its customers and bundling services such as monitoring, maintenance, and updates.

    While this definition captures some of the economic advantages of RaaS, it misses the mark when it comes to describing the operational flexibility and innovation that modern RaaS companies bring to the table. The robotics ecosystem has evolved, and so must our understanding of what it means to operate as a RaaS company.

    The Case for a Refined Definition

    Over the past few years, as an insider in the RaaS ecosystem, and through conversations with stakeholders and analysis of hundreds of companies, I’ve realized that the modern definition of RaaS must go beyond fleet ownership. Instead, it should focus on the key operational and technological features that truly define these companies. These features include:

    1. Autonomous, Fleet-Centric Service Delivery
    2. Subscription-Driven Recurring Revenue
    3. Cloud-Based Backbone
    4. Scalability as a Path to Profitability

    These features collectively redefine what it means to operate as a RaaS company, emphasizing innovation, flexibility, and scalability as the key drivers of success. We now break each of them down.

    1. Autonomous, Fleet-Centric Service Delivery:

    The core value of RaaS lies in using a robotic fleet to deliver continuous services that address dynamic customer needs with minimal human intervention. These services are typically narrowly focused on a specific use case or class of use cases, providing a targeted solution to a customer problem such as warehouse logistics or autonomous cleaning rather than a general-purpose offering. This focus ensures that the service is optimized to meet particular needs effectively.

    Additionally, the autonomy of the fleet is critical for scalability. Autonomous fleets minimize the reliance on human operators, enabling RaaS providers to expand their operations across multiple customer sites without a proportional increase in labor costs.

    2. Subscription-Driven Recurring Revenue:

    A predictable revenue model based on recurring payments tied to the services provided, whether or not the hardware is owned by the RaaS provider. This subscription model establishes a long-term relationship with the customer, creating opportunities for ongoing engagement and the delivery of continuous value.

    The subscription covers access to the software and services necessary to operate, monitor, and maintain the robotic fleet. Some customers do value a subscription model for fleet hardware. However, others prefer outright ownership of their robots while still subscribing to the software and support services. This scenario is sometimes referred to by entrepreneurs as “SaaS for robotic fleets.” I argue that the term Robotics-as-a-Service (RaaS) is sufficient to encompass this arrangement, as it still aligns with the fundamental principles of the model: delivering scalable, subscription-based robotic services that address specific customer needs.

    3. Cloud-Based Backbone:

    A robust infrastructure that enables the remote monitoring, management, and updating of robotic fleets, ensuring real-time optimization and continuous improvement. From the customer’s perspective, this infrastructure is the primary method by which the RaaS provider delivers value and meets Service Level Agreements (SLAs), guaranteeing consistent performance, uptime, and support.

    From the entrepreneur’s perspective, this cloud-based system is a critical enabler of the company’s feedback loop. It allows the provider to track performance metrics and usage patterns, offering valuable insights into how the service is being used. This data is essential for validating business hypotheses, refining the product, and ensuring that the offering continues to meet customer needs effectively. By capturing and analyzing these insights, entrepreneurs can make informed decisions that drive product improvement, enhance operational efficiency, and support the company’s long-term growth and scalability.

    4. Scalability as a Path to Profitability:

    The ability to grow efficiently across multiple sites and customers without proportional increases in operational costs is a defining feature of RaaS and one of the primary reasons it is particularly attractive to entrepreneurs and investors. Unlike other business models for robotics, where the path to growth is often unclear or difficult to narrow down, RaaS comes with an intrinsic engine of growth. This built-in scalability enables RaaS companies to expand their reach and customer base systematically while maintaining cost efficiency, setting it apart as a compelling and sustainable business model.

    That said, while the path to scaling a RaaS company is clearly defined, it is by no means easy. Entrepreneurs must navigate challenges such as operational complexities, customer acquisition, and market differentiation. However, the clarity of the model provides a roadmap for growth that allows companies to focus their efforts on execution rather than conceptualizing how to scale. This combination of a well-defined growth trajectory and cost-efficiency makes RaaS a standout opportunity in the robotics business ecosystem, attracting stakeholders eager to build businesses with predictable revenue and long-term profitability.

    Ownership Flexibility: A Key Shift

    Under this refined definition, ownership of the robotic fleet is no longer a defining factor of RaaS. Instead, a RaaS company may operate fleets owned by:

    • The RaaS provider itself, managing both hardware and services.
    • The customer, who uses the provider’s software and services to operate their fleet.
    • A third party, enabling flexible financing or leasing arrangements.

    For RaaS startups, the ability to shift fleet ownership to customers or third parties is not just an option, it’s often a necessity. Owning an ever-increasing fleet of robots requires allocating a substantial portion of their precious and limited funding to finance hardware assets. This allocation can have a negative ripple effect by shortening the runway of the startup, thereby increasing the risk of failure.

    In many cases, corporate customers, often with much deeper pockets than a startup, are both willing and able to absorb the financial burden of the fleet. For these companies, financing operational assets is a routine part of their business practices, covering elements like machinery, vehicles, or IT systems. By allowing customers to own the fleet and pay for the RaaS company’s software and services, entrepreneurs can focus their resources on innovation, scaling, and delivering value, rather than being tied down by hardware financing.

    This ownership flexibility allows RaaS companies to adapt to diverse market demands, opening doors for new partnerships, revenue streams, and business models that align with customer needs and financial realities. It also provides a viable path for startups to grow sustainably without being constrained by the significant capital allocation associated with fleet ownership.

    Moreover, ownership flexibility extends to the sourcing of the robotic fleet itself. While many RaaS entrepreneurs opt for developing and manufacturing their own custom robots, an alternative approach involves integrating robots developed and manufactured by third parties. This requires the RaaS company to establish strategic partnerships to ensure seamless integration and compatibility. This approach reduces the hardware development burden, enabling the RaaS provider to prioritize scaling their service layer efficiently.

    This ownership and sourcing flexibility empowers RaaS companies to innovate and adapt while simultaneously positioning them as agile players in a dynamic market, capable of meeting diverse customer needs and achieving sustainable growth.

    Examples Highlighting the Evolving Landscape of RaaS

    The refined definition of Robotics-as-a-Service (RaaS) emphasizes flexibility and scalability, going beyond traditional notions of fleet ownership to focus on the operational and technological features that truly define the model. Two companies exemplify how this refined perspective can coexist with diverse approaches to fleet sourcing and management: Locus Robotics and Energy Robotics.

    Locus Robotics operates within the traditional concept of RaaS by developing its own custom autonomous mobile robots (AMRs) for warehouse and logistics applications. Their RaaS offering allows customers to reduce the upfront cost of automation by shifting from a capital expenditure (CapEx) model to a subscription-based operational expenditure (OpEx) model. This structure makes automation more accessible and helps businesses achieve a significantly shorter time to ROI. Locus retains full ownership of the robotic fleet, which aligns with the traditional RaaS framework, yet its operational focus and scalable service delivery perfectly embody the elements of the refined definition.

    On the other hand, Energy Robotics redefines fleet ownership by integrating an increasing range of third-party robots into their inspection platform. These include robots from manufacturers such as ExRobotics, Boston Dynamics (Spot), ANYbotics, and a variety of drones. Instead of owning or financing the robots, Energy Robotics enables its customers to purchase the hardware directly from the source. The value of their RaaS offering lies in the cloud-based backbone and software platform that allows for remote monitoring, fleet management, and the efficient execution of autonomous inspections across industries such as oil and gas, chemicals, and energy. By removing the burden of hardware ownership while still delivering recurring subscription-based services, Energy Robotics illustrates how the refined RaaS definition can accommodate non-traditional ownership models.

    Despite their contrasting approaches to fleet sourcing and ownership, both Locus Robotics and Energy Robotics exemplify the core elements of the refined RaaS definition. They deliver autonomous, fleet-centric services, leverage subscription-driven recurring revenue, utilize a robust cloud-based backbone, and prioritize scalability as a path to profitability.

    The Path Forward

    By refining the definition of RaaS, we move beyond outdated limitations and embrace the full potential of this transformative business model. A more inclusive and precise understanding of RaaS positions companies to innovate and scale, ensuring they meet the growing demand for flexible, scalable, and efficient robotic solutions.

    I’d love to hear your thoughts: Does your robotics business fit this refined definition of RaaS? What opportunities or challenges have you seen in applying these principles? Let’s explore how RaaS will continue to evolve together.

    Join the conversation on LinkedIn

  • The Robotics Business Playbook: Six Proven Approaches

    The Robotics Business Playbook: Six Proven Approaches

    Robotics is transforming industries worldwide, but for entrepreneurs looking to build businesses in this space, the question remains: how can you create value and succeed with robotics? The robotics business ecosystem offers diverse models, each tailored to different needs, customers, and industry contexts. Choosing the right approach depends on understanding your strengths, market demands, and how you deliver value effectively.

    Here’s a breakdown of the key approaches to building a business with robotics, starting with Robotics-as-a-Service (RaaS), a model that has revolutionized access to robotics.

    1. Robotics-as-a-Service (RaaS)

    RaaS is a subscription-based model where customers pay for robotic services rather than purchasing hardware outright. This eliminates heavy upfront costs and allows businesses to scale their automation needs on demand. RaaS providers typically maintain ownership of the robotic fleet and bundle services such as monitoring, maintenance, and updates to ensure consistent performance and uptime.

    A true RaaS company is defined by its ability to deliver autonomous, fleet-centric services through a subscription-driven revenue model. Central to its operation is cloud-based fleet management, enabling remote monitoring, updates, and real-time optimization. Most importantly, the RaaS model emphasizes scalability as a path to profitability, allowing entrepreneurs to build businesses that are both financially predictable and operationally efficient.

    • Example: Companies offering automated cleaning, warehouse logistics, or field inspections as ongoing services.

    2. Robotics Engineering and Consulting Services

    In this approach, companies provide customized solutions for clients by designing, developing, and integrating robotics into their operations. This model is project-based and often caters to industries with unique or niche needs where off-the-shelf solutions fall short.

    One of the key advantages of this model is that it enables companies to grow gradually and organically in response to the evolving needs of their clients. It often starts with a small, highly skilled team servicing a limited number of narrowly focused projects. As successful outcomes drive new opportunities and demand increases, these companies can expand incrementally, building expertise, reputation, and capacity over time while minimizing upfront investment and risk.

    • Example: A robotics firm creating a bespoke robotic arm for a specialized manufacturing process or automating tasks in hazardous environments.

    3. Robotic Platform Sales

    This approach closely mirrors the traditional hardware sales model, where a product is designed, produced, and sold to clients, who then assume ownership. Businesses manufacture and sell complete robotic solutions as standalone products, often providing essential control and autonomy software alongside the hardware. This software serves as a solid starting point, enabling customers to adapt the robots to their specific applications.

    The Robotic Platform Sales model, while effective, comes with distinct challenges. Its focus on hardware development means that iteration cycles are inherently slower and more costly compared to software-based solutions. Additionally, companies must manage inventory, production logistics, and supply chains, all of which demand significant upfront investment. Customers purchasing these platforms typically have their own teams to operate, maintain, and customize the systems, positioning this model as an ideal choice for organizations with the technical expertise to integrate and further develop the robotics solutions for their specific needs.

    4. Robotics Software Infrastructure

    In this model, businesses focus on developing specialized software that enhances the functionality of robotic systems. Offerings may include fleet management tools, navigation systems, or AI-driven capabilities like visual SLAM (Simultaneous Localization and Mapping). The typical customer base for these companies includes hardware manufacturers of robotic solutions, such as RaaS entrepreneurs, who leverage these software components to accelerate their development efforts.

    The key value proposition revolves around reducing time-to-market for robotics companies while also minimizing the size and technical expertise required for their in-house teams. By providing ready-made, reliable software solutions, Robotics Software Infrastructure companies allow their customers to focus on their core business offerings (whether that’s hardware development, service delivery, or industry-specific integration) while benefiting from proven, state-of-the-art software capabilities. This model positions software providers as strategic enablers within the robotics ecosystem, helping their clients scale faster and operate more efficiently.

    • Example: A company providing fleet management software to help RaaS startups optimize their robotic operations.

    5. Project-Oriented Robotics Services

    This approach involves deploying robotics for temporary, specialized projects. Unlike RaaS, which emphasizes continuous service, these solutions are used for time-limited tasks like disaster response, infrastructure inspection, or high-risk missions. However, this type of service often requires intense supervision and/or teleoperation from highly skilled human operators to ensure successful execution. This reliance on human oversight, combined with the specialized nature of the tasks, limits its scalability compared to more autonomous and continuously operating models like RaaS.

    While project-oriented services can deliver significant value in niche applications, their labor-intensive nature makes them best suited for high-impact, short-term deployments where precision and expertise are paramount.

    • Example: Robotic services for underwater inspections, post-disaster cleanups, or construction layout marking.

    6. Robotics Venture Factory

    A venture factory systematically creates, launches, and scales multiple robotics businesses under a single umbrella. By centralizing core resources such as R&D, engineering, and business development, it enables the rapid development of specialized robotics companies that address specific market needs. Unlike traditional consultancy projects, which handle problem-solving on a one-off basis, this model fosters deep collaboration with clients to co-develop solutions and co-own the resulting spinoffs, effectively transforming them into “venture clients”. This shared ownership aligns incentives, ensuring that both parties contribute to and benefit from the success of the new venture.

    The Robotics Venture Factory model offers three key advantages: specialization and focus, where dedicated ventures tackle specific problems or industries, ensuring deep expertise and rapid scaling within their niche; shared resources and efficiency, with centralized R&D, engineering, and administrative teams reducing costs and enabling access to high-level expertise without duplication; and client-driven innovation, where close collaboration with “venture clients” grounds solutions in real-world market needs, increasing the likelihood of achieving product-market fit and long-term success.

    This model positions the venture factory as a powerful engine for scalable innovation, capable of turning client challenges into successful, market-ready robotics businesses.

    • Example: Blue Ocean Robotics, which pioneered the venture factory model in the robotics domain, spined off ventures like UVD Robots (disinfection robots) and PTR Robots (patient transfer and rehabilitation robots), each targeting specific market needs with specialized solutions.

    Choosing the Right Approach

    The robotics business ecosystem is rich with opportunities, but success hinges on matching the right business model to your strengths and market demand. Whether you’re offering a scalable service through RaaS, delivering customized solutions, or creating platforms and software to empower others, focusing on solving real-world problems will set your robotics venture apart.

    It’s important to note that these business models are not mutually exclusive. Many successful robotics companies strategically combine multiple approaches to maximize value and address broader market needs. For example, a company offering Robotics-as-a-Service (RaaS) might also sell its software platform as a standalone product, allowing customers with their own fleets to benefit from advanced tools like fleet management or AI-powered navigation. Similarly, a venture focused on custom robotics solutions might leverage the knowledge gained from consulting projects to develop a standardized product for wider market adoption.

    Success often depends on finding the right blend of business models that align with your company’s strengths, technological expertise, and customer demands. By remaining adaptable and exploring synergies between these approaches, robotics entrepreneurs can unlock new revenue streams, enhance customer satisfaction, and position themselves for long-term growth in an ever-evolving market.

    Which of these models resonates most with your goals or experience? Are you building a scalable RaaS business, delivering customized solutions, or perhaps developing software tools to empower robotics companies? I’d love to hear how others in the robotics space are approaching business opportunities!

    Additionally, have you seen or explored other business models for robotics beyond the six listed here? The robotics industry is constantly evolving, and new opportunities often emerge at the intersection of technology and business innovation. Let’s start a conversation and share insights that can help shape the future of robotics entrepreneurship! 🚀

    Join the conversation on LinkedIn

  • Why Robotics Startups Fail: Building Solutions in Search of a Problem

    Why Robotics Startups Fail: Building Solutions in Search of a Problem

    Why do so many robotics startups stumble right out of the gate? One of the most critical, yet overlooked, reasons lies in “building before validating”. Founders often charge ahead with product development, fueled by excitement for their technology, but neglect to confirm if they’re solving a real problem for real customers.

    Here are the most common pitfalls I’ve observed, mistakes that can derail even the most promising robotics ventures if left unchecked:

    1. Ignoring the Leap-of-Faith Hypotheses: Every startup hinges on a few critical questions: Who is your customer? What’s their most pressing problem? Will they pay for a solution? Many founders treat their responses to these questions as facts rather than assumptions and dive headfirst into building their technology without validating them. This “leap of faith” is where the real risk lies.
    2. Self-Deception from Customers’ Vague Input: After a few surface-level conversations, it’s easy for founders to hear what they want to hear. The reality? Most customers don’t fully know what they want. Without deep, continuous experimentation, startups risk mistaking vague input for validation and veering off course.
    3. Tech-First, Learning-Last Roadmaps: Roadmaps prioritizing technological milestones (“Let’s build and see how customers react”) often lead to wasted time and resources. Instead, founders need to establish validated learning milestones that focus on testing assumptions and gathering evidence before committing to full-scale development.
    4. The Impatience Trap: Entrepreneurs are often eager to start building immediately, skipping rigorous problem validation. The thrill of seeing robots in action can mask deeper flaws in the product-market fit.

    Key takeaway

    Don’t fall in love with your technology before understanding your customer. As with any other type of venture, robotics entrepreneurship thrives on solving critical, validated problems not building solutions in search of a problem. By validating assumptions early and embracing customer-driven learning, robotics founders can build products that truly matter and businesses that thrive.

    Has your team ever wrestled with balancing innovation and validation? I’d love to hear your thoughts and experiences!

    Join the conversation on LinkedIn